Bob Sullivan’s online article, “Gov’t agencies, colleges demand applicants’ Facebook passwords,” is a quick reminder that questions about the U.S. Constitution and the specific liberties that the Constitution protects continue to be raised in today’s world.
The article, focused on the fact that some universities and employers are now demanding access to individuals’ private social media content, raises questions about whether those demanding organizations may be violating the rights of the individuals involved – rights that some would argue are guaranteed by the Constitution.
For example, a Washington D.C.-lawyer quoted in the article states: “I can’t believe some people think it’s OK to do this. Maybe it’s OK if you live in a totalitarian regime, but we still have a Constitution to protect us. It’s not a far leap from reading people’s Facebook posts to reading their email. …As a society, where are we going to draw the line?”
I was personally surprised to learn that my alma mater, The University of North Carolina, recently revised its handbook, adding a provision that requires each athletic team to “identify either a coach or administrator who is responsible for having access to and regularly monitoring the content of their team members’ social networking sites.”
Do you think that employers and universities should be able to require individuals to divulge their user names and private passwords for the social networks to which they belong? And, if not, which individual right or rights do you think are denied when such policies exist? Sullivan’s article references the individual right to privacy as well as to the right to free speech.
Turning back to the Constitution, do you know which Article or Amendment provides for an individual’s right to free speech? The answer is Amendment 1, the First Amendment. And, what about the right to privacy? Is that right protected by the Constitution? The author of the online article, “Exploring Constitutional Conflicts,” contends that the Constitution “contains no express right to privacy.”
It seems like there are two sides to the social media coin today. On one hand, we’ve recently seen social media tools like Twitter aid individuals in reclaiming their rights and defeating oppressive government regimes like Mubarak’s in Egpyt. On the other hand, in the instances like those referenced in Sullivan’s article, social media technologies seem to be putting individuals’ rights at risk.
When it comes to the question of employees and universities demanding individuals to share their user names and Facebook passwords, which side are you on, and do you think the Constitution addresses the question?